Afghan held at Guantanamo Bay freed after 15 years without trial | Taliban News

The Taliban stated Asadullah Haroon Gul was one of many final two Afghan prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay.

An Afghan prisoner held at Guantanamo Bay for about 15 years with out trial has been launched from US custody, the Taliban authorities in Afghanistan and a world human rights group stated.

Asadullah Haroon Gul’s launch was introduced on Friday by Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban-appointed deputy tradition and knowledge minister, who stated that Gul was one of many final two Afghan prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay.

Gul, who is about to fly to Kabul quickly, was detained by US forces in Jalalabad in 2007 and was held for 15 years with out trial, stated Suhail Shaheen, a senior Taliban official who relies in Qatar.

America opened the infamous Guantanamo Bay jail beneath President George W Bush in January 2002 after the 9/11 assaults and the invasion of Afghanistan to seize al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden.

Set as much as maintain and interrogate these suspected of getting hyperlinks to al-Qaeda, dozens of suspects from a number of nations have been despatched there and it grew to become infamous after reviews emerged of prisoners being humiliated and tortured.

Gul was handed over to the Taliban’s authorities because of their talks with US authorities, Mujahid stated.

“Because of the efforts of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and its direct and constructive interplay with the USA, one of many remaining two detainees, Asadullah Haroon, was launched from Guantanamo jail,” he stated on Twitter.


Mujahid shared no additional particulars in regards to the whereabouts of Gul.

The UK-based rights group Reprieve stated Gul was despatched to Guantanamo Bay in 2007.

“His household feared him lifeless for a few years and for the primary 9 years of his captivity, he didn’t have entry to a lawyer, regardless of a number of makes an attempt to acquire authorized illustration,” the assertion stated.

Reprieve and the legislation agency Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss filed a petition on Gul’s behalf in 2016 and “demanded his launch”.

After years of litigation, in October 2021, a Washington court docket dominated that Gul was not a part of al-Qaeda and ordered his launch.

In accordance with the assertion from Reprieve, Gul “suffered extreme bodily and psychological torture throughout his detention, together with being crushed, hung by his wrists, disadvantaged of meals and water, and prevented from praying. He has been subjected to sleep deprivation, extraordinarily chilly temperatures and solitary confinement.”

Commenting on Gul’s launch, his lawyer at Reprieve, Mark Maher, stated that Gul “missed his daughter’s complete childhood and he won’t ever get again what has been taken from him, however he’s now no less than in a position to rebuild his life together with his household, who’ve waited so lengthy to see him.”

Republican Senator Marco Rubio, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, criticised the Biden administration for permitting Gul’s switch.

“The terrorist organisation that now controls Afghanistan can not and won’t guarantee Gul, or any future detainees who’re launched, is not going to return to the battlefield and doubtlessly kill Individuals or different harmless civilians,” Rubio stated, referring to the Taliban, who seized energy in Afghanistan final August.

How will France’s president govern over the next five years? | Show Types

From: Inside Story

French President Emmanuel Macron’s alliance misplaced its majority within the Nationwide Meeting in legislative elections.

French President Emmanuel Macron is going through 5 years of political turmoil, after his alliance misplaced its majority within the Nationwide Meeting in legislative elections.

It’s the primary time that’s occurred to a president’s get together in 20 years.

The most important winners have been the far-right and the far-left.

The leaders of each camps say they’re decided to complicate Macron’s legislative agenda, each domestically and internationally.

However lower than half of eligible voters solid a poll within the second spherical election on Sunday.

So, how will Macron govern over the following 5 years?

Presenter: Adrian Finighan


Hamid Chriet – Political analyst

Philippe Marliere – Professor of French & European Politics, College School London

Fabrice Pothier – CEO, Rasmussen International and political commentator

America-nomics: Looking back at Johnson years to understand today | Business and Economy

What’s taking place with the US financial system?

Is it booming? Jobs are up, wages are up, shopper spending is excessive.

Or is it on the verge of catastrophe? Crypto-currency has crashed, inventory markets are down, the actual property market is slowing. Inflation is up and the Federal Reserve might act to regulate it. That usually brings every thing down.

It’s complicated, to say the least.

The easiest way to evaluate an financial system will not be by means of idea however by means of historic comparisons. In contrast to idea, historical past is factual. Principle is the theoreticians’ selection.

The state of affairs at the moment doubtless has the closest parallels with the late Nineteen Sixties, the Lyndon Johnson into Richard Nixon years.

Right here is why.

Donald Trump’s most important financial coverage was chopping taxes, primarily for the wealthy. We’ve seen that occur 5 occasions within the final 100 years.

4 occasions – within the Nineteen Twenties, Nineteen Eighties, a comparatively minor model within the late Nineties, and within the 2000s – the very same sample occurred: tax cuts, primarily for the wealthy. A increase. Wealth will increase on the prime, which morphs right into a sequence of bubbles in finance. Bubbles pop. A crash, adopted by a recession or despair.

On all 4 events, actual monetary well being got here solely after some reversal of these tax insurance policies.

There was one exception. It got here within the Johnson years.

The US has “marginal” revenue tax charges. Consider a layer cake. The federal government takes separate bites of every layer. The smallest from the underside, the largest from the highest.

From 1944 to 1964, all revenue larger than $200,000 was taxed at 90 p.c. Or a bit extra. In 1964, that charge would kick in on all revenue larger than about $1.9m in at the moment’s {dollars}. Johnson took the highest marginal charge – that’s the vital one – down from 90 p.c to 70 p.c. When you look it up, it’s nearly at all times known as “the Kennedy tax cuts”. The reason being that the individuals who love and admire tax cuts are keen so as to add this one to Kennedy’s report and hate to present Johnson constructive credit score for something. Their justification is that Kennedy “talked about” doing it. However as with a lot Kennedy mythology, it was Johnson who truly did it.

After the Johnson tax cuts, there was a increase. But it surely didn’t morph right into a bubble. No crash. No recession or despair. Why did the Johnson tax cuts have a unique outcome than the others? And what does it imply for the impact of the Trump cuts at the moment?

All the opposite tax cuts had been put by means of by the “markets good, authorities unhealthy” individuals. These tax cuts had been accompanied by cuts in authorities spending and the withdrawal of presidency assist for the center and decrease lessons. All the advantages went – in accelerating kind – to the highest. Because the focus of funding cash exceeded the power of society to purchase what that cash would produce if it went in direction of truly producing issues, that cash went in direction of investing in itself. In finance. In a number of varieties – shares, commodities, actual property, shopper loans, and monetary devices. You could possibly consider it as concentrates of inflation. Booms grew to become bubbles. Bubbles burst.

Johnson was very a lot a “authorities good, does many issues higher than markets” individual. He put by means of the tax cuts to get assist for the issues he actually wished: Huge spending on the center class, labour, and the poor to construct “the Nice Society”. Medicare, Medicaid, Head Begin, Nationwide Endowment for the Arts, PBS, the Battle on Poverty, public training, housing, and plenty extra. As well as, he had the struggle in Vietnam. Battle is generally checked out as a adverse. However the historic truth – for america – is that wars are normally nice for the financial system. They create full employment. Particularly for that in any other case troublesome group – younger males. Wars additionally demand – and permit – plenty of authorities spending on science, know-how, manufacturing, transportation, and providers. Johnson’s spending on the Nice Society and the struggle counterbalanced the rise of wealth on the prime. That’s the closest historic precedent for present circumstances.

This time issues had been divided up. Trump did the cuts, Biden did the spending.

COVID-19, bridging the 2 administrations, confuses the image. It seems to be the reason for the crash of 2020. Really, it was a blip. The tax cuts stayed in place. The focus of capital continued. The bubbles – inventory market, actual property, monetary creations like crypto-currencies – resumed their rise. Now, they’re trembling.

COVID-19 additionally enabled Biden to spend. However the Republican dedication to creating authorities fail was so sturdy and the Democratic majority was so slender that one individual may cripple Biden’s formidable agenda. And Joe Manchin did.

COVID-19 had the ability to open a door for large authorities motion. The Russian invasion of Ukraine additionally permits spending. It’s nearly unattainable to inform how a lot, however a big a part of that comes again in fee for US navy provides and providers.

Nonetheless, if the tax cuts proceed, they’ll create a serious crash. We’re already seeing the tremors and trembles that sign this. If the spending continues, nevertheless, it is going to sluggish that course of, cushion it, and velocity the restoration. If there’s a crash, the worst factor to do is minimize spending. The fantasy of austerity is a big cause the Nice Recession was “Nice” relatively than “Reasonable” or “Regular”. The nice secret – although it’s seen for all to see and accessible from a couple of hours of analysis that anybody can do from house – is that full restoration comes – as a historic truth – solely after the tax cuts that triggered the crash are rescinded.

The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially replicate Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.